img Leseprobe Leseprobe

The Crime of Aggression

The Quest for Justice in an Age of Drones, Cyberattacks, Insurgents, and Autocrats

Noah Weisbord

ca. 33,99
Amazon iTunes Hugendubel Bü kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble Legimi
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Princeton University Press img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Internationales Recht, Ausländisches Recht


A gripping behind-the-scenes account of the dramatic legal fight to hold leaders personally responsible for aggressive war

On July 17, 2018, starting an unjust war became a prosecutable international crime alongside genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Instead of collective state responsibility, our leaders are now personally subject to indictment for crimes of aggression, from invasions and preemptions to drone strikes and cyberattacks. The Crime of Aggression is Noah Weisbord’s riveting insider’s account of the high-stakes legal fight to enact this historic legislation and hold politicians accountable for the wars they start.

Weisbord, a key drafter of the law for the International Criminal Court, takes readers behind the scenes of one of the most consequential legal dramas in modern international diplomacy. Drawing on in-depth interviews and his own invaluable insights, he sheds critical light on the motivations of the prosecutors, diplomats, and military strategists who championed the fledgling prohibition on unjust war—and those who tried to sink it. He untangles the complex history behind the measure, tracing how the crime of aggression was born at the Nuremberg trials only to fall dormant during the Cold War, and he draws lessons from such pivotal events as the collapse of the League of Nations, the rise of the United Nations, September 11, and the war on terror.

The power to try leaders for unjust war holds untold promise for the international order, but also great risk. In this incisive and vitally important book, Weisbord explains how judges in such cases can balance the imperatives of justice and peace, and how the fair prosecution of aggression can humanize modern statecraft.

Weitere Titel von diesem Autor
Weitere Titel zum gleichen Preis



Military operation, Warfare, Disarmament, Pretext, Arrest warrant, International Court of Justice, International law, Barack Obama, Nazi Germany, Vladimir Putin, Saddam Hussein, Al-Qaeda, Rwanda, Iraq War, Sovereignty, David Scheffer, Statute, Act of Aggression, International criminal law, Peacekeeping, Attempt, Insurgency, Territorial integrity, Edict, Law enforcement, Great power, De minimis, Amendment, Omar al-Bashir, United Nations Security Council, Nuremberg principles, Nuremberg Charter, League of Nations, Council on Foreign Relations, Mercenary, Right of self-defense, Accountability, Nuremberg, Authorization, George W. Bush, Ethnic cleansing, Reprisal, Blockade, Politician, Impeachment, Lyndon B. Johnson, Rule of law, Customary international law, Humanitarian intervention, Responsibility to protect, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, War, Declaration of war, Crime of aggression, Treaty, World War I, Assassination, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Subsequent Nuremberg trials, Indictment, Henry Kissinger, Just war theory, Politics, Syrian civil war, Precedent, United States Department of State, International relations, Law of war, Samantha Power, Weapon of mass destruction, Adolf Hitler, Jurisdiction, President of the United States, Legal Advisor (Office for the Administrative Review of the Detention of Enemy Combatants), Peace enforcement, Lawfare, Jus ad bellum, Defendant, Member state, Westphalian sovereignty, Lawyer, Nuclear weapon, Soviet Union, Prosecutor, Impunity, World War II, Torture, Crime against peace, Terrorism, Crime, War of aggression, War crime, Ambiguity (law), Nuremberg trials, International Criminal Court, Invasion of Kuwait, John F. Kennedy, Human Rights Watch, Judicial interpretation, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi