Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Wirtschaft
For decades women working as nurses, librarians, and secretaries have argued that they are paid less than men in jobs requiring comparable skill and effort. By the late 1980s, the notion of "comparable worth" had become a familiar one, and comparable worth initiatives were being developed to counteract the persistent disparities between male and female pay. In a comprehensive assessment of this policy, Elaine Sorensen lays out the various approaches states have taken, identifying the most and least successful among them.
The author attributes part of the gender pay gap to economic discrimination and suggests theoretical models that best explain this discrimination. She examines the usefulness of comparable worth policies as a means of reducing male/female wage disparities. Minnesota's policies are examined in detail as an example of promising efforts in this regard. Sorensen ends by examining comparable worth's likely future fate in Congress and the courts.
Elaine Sorensen is Senior Research Associate at the Urban Institute in Washington, D.C.
Originally published in 1994.
The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
Prince Edward Island, Disparate treatment, Court order, Party platform, Workforce, Plaintiff, Year, Dummy variable (statistics), Allegation, Executive (government), Civil and political rights, Employment discrimination, General Accounting Office, Employment, Constitutional amendment, State legislature (United States), Disparate impact, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amendment, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Legislation, Lawsuit, Precedent, Regression analysis, Household, Sex ratio, Civil Rights Act of 1991, Requirement, Pharmacist, Jurisdiction, Defendant, Civil Rights Act, Consulting firm, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Pretext, National Academy of Sciences, Government of Canada, Implementation, Federal government of the United States, Job evaluation, Prima facie, Of Education, State government, Affirmative action, Federal judge, Women's work, Participation (decision making), Graduate school, Panel Study of Income Dynamics, Supreme Court of the United States, Private sector, Civil service, Accountability, Temporary work, Consideration, Economist, Wage, Occupational segregation, Payment, State governments of the United States, Salary, Income, Labour economics, Guideline, Current population survey (US), Yale University, Minnesota Legislature, Determinant, Equal employment opportunity, Gender pay gap, Circumstantial evidence, Calculation, Executive Order 11246, Union Movement, Inference, United States district court, Anthony Kennedy, Minimum wage, Nationality, Bennett Amendment, Clerk, Sexism, U.S. state, Just price, Title IX, Percentage