img Leseprobe Leseprobe

Persuasive Peers

Social Communication and Voting in Latin America

Andy Baker, Lúcio Rennó, Barry Ames, et al.

ca. 28,99
Amazon iTunes Hugendubel Bü kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble Legimi
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Princeton University Press img Link Publisher

Geisteswissenschaften, Kunst, Musik / Pädagogik


How voting behavior in Latin America is influenced by social networks and everyday communication among peers

In Latin America’s new democracies, political parties and mass partisanship are not deeply entrenched, leaving many votes up for grabs during election campaigns. In a typical presidential election season, between one-quarter and one-half of all voters—figures unheard of in older democracies—change their voting intentions across party lines in the months before election day. Advancing a new theory of Latin American voting behavior, Persuasive Peers argues that political discussions within informal social networks among family members, friends, neighbors, coworkers, and acquaintances explain this volatility and exert a major influence on final voting choices.

Relying on unique survey and interview data from Latin America, the authors show that weakly committed voters defer to their politically knowledgeable peers, creating vast amounts of preference change as political campaigns unfold. Peer influences also matter for unwavering voters, who tend to have social contacts that reinforce their voting intentions. Social influence increases political conformity among voters within neighborhoods, states, and even entire regions, and the authors illustrate how party machines use the social topography of electorates to buy off well-connected voters who can magnify the impact of the payoff.

Persuasive Peers demonstrates how everyday communication shapes political outcomes in Latin America’s less-institutionalized democracies.



Multinomial logistic regression, Cross-sectional data, Incumbent, Political campaign, Americans, Activism, Spouse, Panel data, Supporter, Political philosophy, Democratization, Newspaper, Centre-right politics, Monograph, Upper class, Politician, Elite, Politics, Vicente Fox, Effective number of parties, Ideology, Mass politics, World Values Survey, Social environment, Abstention, Statistical significance, Voting behavior, National Science Foundation, Two-party system, Latin America, Voting, Social Science Research Council, Effect size, Deliberation, Level of analysis, Front-runner, Month, Respondent, Running mate, WhatsApp, Income, Election, Comparative politics, Geraldo Alckmin, Social exclusion, Political science, Standard deviation, Rates (tax), Ballot, Dummy variable (statistics), Communication, Privatization, Measurement, Political communication, Clientelism, Dilma Rousseff, Pork barrel, Nationalization, Wealth, Family income, Confidence interval, Percentage point, Subsidy, Competition, Multi-party system, Coefficient, Club good, Political party, Quantity, Estimation, Exclusion, Participatory budgeting, Juiz de Fora, Political geography, Party system, Cambridge University Press, Political machine, Social determinism, Socioeconomic status, Democracy, Logistic regression, Likelihood function, Society, Latin Americans, Confounding, Citizenship, Marina Silva, Sampling (statistics), Social influence, Social relation, Percentage, Probability, Left-wing politics, Logit, Opinion poll, Brazilians, Calculation, Accountability, Subset, Mexicans