img Leseprobe Leseprobe

The President Who Would Not Be King

Executive Power under the Constitution

Michael W. McConnell

ca. 24,99
Amazon iTunes Hugendubel Bü kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble Legimi
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Princeton University Press img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Politikwissenschaft


Vital perspectives for the divided Trump era on what the Constitution's framers intended when they defined the extent—and limits—of presidential power

One of the most vexing questions for the framers of the Constitution was how to create a vigorous and independent executive without making him king. In today's divided public square, presidential power has never been more contested. The President Who Would Not Be King cuts through the partisan rancor to reveal what the Constitution really tells us about the powers of the president.

Michael McConnell provides a comprehensive account of the drafting of presidential powers. Because the framers met behind closed doors and left no records of their deliberations, close attention must be given to their successive drafts. McConnell shows how the framers worked from a mental list of the powers of the British monarch, and consciously decided which powers to strip from the presidency to avoid tyranny. He examines each of these powers in turn, explaining how they were understood at the time of the founding, and goes on to provide a framework for evaluating separation of powers claims, distinguishing between powers that are subject to congressional control and those in which the president has full discretion.

Based on the Tanner Lectures at Princeton University, The President Who Would Not Be King restores the original vision of the framers, showing how the Constitution restrains the excesses of an imperial presidency while empowering the executive to govern effectively.

Weitere Titel von diesem Autor



Vesting Clauses, Americans, Law enforcement, Deliberation, Jurist, United States federal judge, University of Texas at Austin, Impeachment, Institution, Precedent, Congressional oversight, Government, Consideration, Presidential system, Article One of the United States Constitution, Ratification, Democratic republic, Harvard Law School, United States Attorney, Military operation, Public university, Prerogative, Despotism, Prosecutor, Injunction, Monarchy of the United Kingdom, Constitutional amendment, Constitution of the United Kingdom, Enumerated powers, Deputy Attorney General, Columbia University, Populism, Executive order, Barack Obama, Constitution, Regime, Delegate, Immigration policy, University of California, Hastings College of the Law, National security, Dear colleague letter, Politics, State attorney general, Technological change, Unilateralism, Judicial deference, Articles of Confederation, Declaration of war, Princeton University, Elective monarchy, Original intent, Lawyer, Separation of powers, Advocacy group, George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton, Christian Legal Society, Public sphere, Royal prerogative, Virginia Plan, Appointments Clause, State constitution (Australia), Ronald Reagan, Donald Trump, Executive privilege, Presidency of Donald Trump, Christopher L. Eisgruber, President of the United States, Insurance, Voting, Newspaper, White House Counsel, Executive (government), Office of Legal Counsel, Subsidy, Demagogue, Misdemeanor, Stephen Macedo, Article Two of the United States Constitution, Modernity, Political party, Review article, Provision (contracting), Republican Party (United States), Original meaning, Veto, United States Constitution, Treaty, Oath of office, Foreign policy, Benghazi, Legislature, Michael W. McConnell, Nomination, Student group, Committee of Detail, Lecture, Primary source, Monarchy, Legislation