Minds Wide Shut
Gary Saul Morson, Morton Schapiro
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Wirtschaft
A timely exploration of intellectual dogmatism in politics, economics, religion, and literature—and what can be done to fight it
Polarization may be pushing democracy to the breaking point. But few have explored the larger, interconnected forces that have set the stage for this crisis: namely, a rise in styles of thought, across a range of fields, that literary scholar Gary Saul Morson and economist Morton Schapiro call “fundamentalist.” In Minds Wide Shut, Morson and Schapiro examine how rigid adherence to ideological thinking has altered politics, economics, religion, and literature in ways that are mutually reinforcing and antithetical to the open-mindedness and readiness to compromise that animate democracy. In response, they propose alternatives that would again make serious dialogue possible.
Fundamentalist thinking, Morson and Schapiro argue, is not limited to any one camp. It flourishes across the political spectrum, giving rise to dueling monologues of shouting and abuse between those who are certain that they can’t be wrong, that truth and justice are all on their side, and that there is nothing to learn from their opponents, who must be evil or deluded. But things don’t have to be this way. Drawing on thinkers and writers from across the humanities and social sciences, Morson and Schapiro show how we might begin to return to meaningful dialogue through case-based reasoning, objective analyses, lessons drawn from literature, and more.
The result is a powerful invitation to leave behind simplification, rigidity, and extremism—and to move toward a future of greater open-mindedness, moderation, and, perhaps, even wisdom.
Gary Saul Morson, Irony, Self-interest, Looking Backward, Social Darwinism, Historical criticism, Literature, Science, Pseudoscience, On Religion, Ethical dilemma, Religion, Unintended consequences, Religious text, Politics, Philosophy, Alternatives, Cognitive bias, Secularization, Freedom of speech, Prejudice, Dialectical materialism, Thought, Protestantism, Christianity, Reason, Superstition, Ethics, Economics, Economist, Treatise, Leo Tolstoy, The Philosopher, Totalitarianism, Jews, Jane Austen, Midrash, Tax, Marxism, Good and evil, Dialogic, Market economy, Social science, Suffering, Symptom, Certainty, Facebook, Literary realism, World literature, Novelist, Prediction, Satire, Narrative, Fanaticism, Mikhail Bakhtin, Principle, Criticism, Righteous indignation, Calvin (Calvin and Hobbes), Anton Chekhov, Poverty, The Idiot, Casuistry, Stephen Toulmin, The Mind of God, Market fundamentalism, Philosopher, Climate change, Princeton University Press, Uncertainty, Atheism, Rhetoric, Hatred, Superiority (short story), Theory, Human behavior, Irreducible complexity, Racism, Rationality, Christian fundamentalism, Free trade, Suggestion, Eugenics, Darwinism, Irrationality, Christian, On Liberty, Writing, Explanation, Trade-off, Scientist, Parable, Relativism, Skepticism, Falsity, Self-deception, John Stuart Mill, Ideology, Materialism, Capitalism