Regional Orders at Century's Dawn
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Politikwissenschaft
Etel Solingen provides a comprehensive explanation of foreign policy based on how states throughout the world have confronted the rapid emergence of a global economy and international institutions. A major advance in international relations theory, Regional Orders at Century's Dawn skillfully uses a key issue--internationalization--to clarify other recent debates, from the notion of a democratic peace to the relevance of security dilemmas, nationalism, and the impact of international institutions. The author discusses in rich detail the Middle East, Latin America's Southern Cone, and the Korean peninsula, and builds on examples drawn from almost every other region of the world.
As Solingen demonstrates, economic liberalization--with its dramatic political and economic consequences--invariably attracts supporters and detractors, who join in coalitions to advance their agendas. Each coalition's agenda, or "grand strategy," has consequences at all levels: domestic, regional, and international. At home, coalitions struggle to define the internal allocation and management of resources, and to undermine their rivals. Throughout their regional neighborhoods, coalitions opposing internationalization often compete for dominance, sometimes militarily. Coalitions favoring internationalization, instead, often cooperate. At the global level, each coalition finds support for its "grand strategies" from different international institutions and from competing global economic trends. Solingen's concept of "grand strategy" proposes more than a theory of foreign policy and explains the role of nationalism and ethno-religious revivalism in the politics of liberalization.
India-Pakistan War, macroeconomic stability, national-security states, Arab Cooperation Council, Multipartidaria (Argentina), Gulf War (1991), oil crisis (1970s), economic freedom, Chun Doo Hwan, democratic-peace policies, dependency theory, Brazilian-Paraguayan Itaipú project, fundamentalism, ethnic diversity, Khamenei, Ali, counterfactuals, Cruzado plan (Brazil), Davos conference (1997), Nuclear Suppliers Group, Gourevitch, Peter, Arafat, Yassir, Kim Kyong-hui, Levingston, Roberto, democratic advantage theory, Hub-and-Spoke model, macropolitical consensus, Lanusse, Alejandro, Ayatollah Khomeini, imperial strategy, pacific unions, Ecuador, Korean National Youth (South Korea), Mendoza Accord (1991), Harkabi, Yehoshafat, Quadripartite Agreement, Arab-Israeli Wars, Clinton administration, Begin, Menachem, Casablanca Declaration (1994), Amman Summit (1995), Partido da Frente Liberal (Brazil), Greater Israel myth, Algerian coup (1991), Aloni, Shulamit, former Soviet Union, Beagle Channel conflict, nondemocratic peace, Ben-Gurion, Prime Minister, Asian values myth, Arab Maghreb Union, Bosnian debacle (1990s)