img Leseprobe Leseprobe

The Rise of the Agricultural Welfare State

Institutions and Interest Group Power in the United States, France, and Japan

Adam D. Sheingate

EPUB
ca. 62,99
Amazon iTunes Thalia.de Weltbild.de Hugendubel Bücher.de ebook.de kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble bol.com Legimi yourbook.shop Kulturkaufhaus ebooks-center.de
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Princeton University Press img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Politikwissenschaft

Beschreibung

A long-dominant reading of American politics holds that public policy in the United States is easily captured by special interest groups. Countering this view, Adam Sheingate traces the development of government intervention in agriculture from its nineteenth-century origins to contemporary struggles over farm subsidies. His considered conclusion is that American institutions have not given agricultural interest groups any particular advantages in the policy process, in part because opposing lobbies also enjoy access to policymakers. In fact, the high degree of conflict and pluralism maintained by American institutions made possible substantial retrenchment of the agricultural welfare state during the 1980s and 1990s. In Japan and France--two countries with markedly different institutional characters than the United States--powerful agricultural interests and a historically close relationship between farmers, bureaucrats, and politicians continue to preclude a roll-back of farm subsidies.

This well-crafted study not only puts a new spin on agricultural policy, but also makes a strong case for the broader claim that the relatively decentralized American political system is actually less prone to capture and rule by subgovernments than the more centralized political systems found in France and Japan. Sheingate's historical, comparative approach also demonstrates, in a widely useful way, how past institutional developments shape current policies and options.

Kundenbewertungen

Schlagwörter

Policy analysis, Tariff, Regulatory capture, United States Secretary of Agriculture, Economic policy, Politics, Victorian America, Commodity, Common Agricultural Policy, Legislation, Martin Shefter, Farmers' Alliance, The Origins of the Urban Crisis, Government, Welfare state, Political machine, Corporatism, Political alliance, Agricultural extension, World War II, Institution, Jacob Hacker, Bureaucrat, Economics, Political party, Tax, State-owned enterprise, Agricultural cooperative, Farm income, Theda Skocpol, Agriculture (Chinese mythology), Party system, Political science, Taxpayer, Agricultural Adjustment Administration, Jurisdiction, Budget process, Farm crisis, Politician, United States Department of Agriculture, Employment, Obstacle, Technology, Political organization, Agricultural subsidy, Economic interventionism, Welfare, Decentralization, Agricultural policy, Fertilizer, Cost–benefit analysis, Lobbying, Commodity market, Political economy, Production control, Agriculture, Voting, American Farm Bureau Federation, Price support, Subsidy, Activism, Payment, Public policy, Advocacy group, Farmer, Regulation, Direct Payments, Policy, Supply (economics), Economist