* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
License to Harass
Laura Beth Nielsen
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Recht
Beschreibung
Offensive street speech--racist and sexist remarks that can make its targets feel both psychologically and physically threatened--is surprisingly common in our society. Many argue that this speech is so detestable that it should be banned under law. But is this an area covered by the First Amendment right to free speech? Or should it be banned?
In this elegantly written book, Laura Beth Nielsen pursues the answers by probing the legal consciousness of ordinary citizens. Using a combination of field observations and in-depth, semistructured interviews, she surveys one hundred men and women, some of whom are routine targets of offensive speech, about how such speech affects their lives. Drawing on these interviews as well as an interdisciplinary body of scholarship, Nielsen argues that racist and sexist speech creates, reproduces, and reinforces existing systems of hierarchy in public places. The law works to normalize and justify offensive public interactions, she concludes, offering, in essence, a "license to harass."
Nielsen relates the results of her interviews to statistical surveys that measure the impact of offensive speech on the public. Rather than arguing whether law is the appropriate remedy for offensive speech, she allows that the benefits to democracy, to community, and to society of allowing such speech may very well outweigh the burdens imposed. Nonetheless, these burdens, and the stories of the people who bear them, should not remain invisible and outside the debate.
Kundenbewertungen
Explanation, Informant, Pornography, Alternatives, Jurisprudence, Social status, Equal opportunity, Sexism, Violence, Freedom of speech, Everyday life, The Concept of Law, Racism, Attempt, Crime, Censorship, Cynicism (contemporary), Epithet, Public speaking, R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, African Americans, Black people, Street harassment, Ideology, Social issue, Critical race theory, Justifiable homicide, Aggressive panhandling, Sexual orientation, Harassment, Loitering, Begging, Calculation, Journal of Social Issues, Institution, Anti-discrimination law, Gender inequality, Sexual harassment, Lesbian, Domestic violence, Tax, Sociology, Homelessness, Suggestion, Statute, Project manager, Cross burning, Presumption, Respondent, Legal remedy, Political opportunity, Gender role, Oppression, Public space, Fighting words, Legal doctrine, Legal consciousness, Norm (social), Speech code, Legal recourse, Ambiguity (law), Determination, Hate speech, Social theory, State actor, Americans, Clothing, White people, Distrust, Judiciary