* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Judges and Their Audiences
Lawrence Baum
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Recht
Beschreibung
What motivates judges as decision makers? Political scientist Lawrence Baum offers a new perspective on this crucial question, a perspective based on judges' interest in the approval of audiences important to them.
The conventional scholarly wisdom holds that judges on higher courts seek only to make good law, good policy, or both. In these theories, judges are influenced by other people only in limited ways, in consequence of their legal and policy goals. In contrast, Baum argues that the influence of judges' audiences is pervasive. This influence derives from judges' interest in popularity and respect, a motivation central to most people. Judges care about the regard of audiences because they like that regard in itself, not just as a means to other ends. Judges and Their Audiences uses research in social psychology to make the case that audiences shape judges' choices in substantial ways. Drawing on a broad range of scholarship on judicial decision-making and an array of empirical evidence, the book then analyzes the potential and actual impact of several audiences, including the public, other branches of government, court colleagues, the legal profession, and judges' social peers.
Engagingly written, this book provides a deeper understanding of key issues concerning judicial behavior on which scholars disagree, identifies aspects of judicial behavior that diverge from the assumptions of existing models, and shows how those models can be strengthened.
Kundenbewertungen
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Roper v. Simmons, Judge, Statute, United States v. Nixon, Self-image, Public opinion, Criminal law, Federal Court of Appeal (Canada), Social environment, Weisberg, Learned Hand, Opinion, Controversy, Prediction, Appellate court, Anthony Kennedy, Associate Justice, Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice, Calculation, Impression management, Identity (social science), Greenhouse effect (judicial drift), Determinant, Self-concept, Reference group, Decision-making, Law review, Law school, Legal profession, Law clerk, Federal judge, Political science, Public policy, Legislator, Criticism, Harry Blackmun, Judiciary, Roe v. Wade, Writing, Standing (law), Grutter v. Bollinger, Policy, Good law, Civil liberties, Result, Lawyer, Hostility, Appointee, Social group, Explanation, Consideration, Practice of law, Requirement, Affirmative action, Legal doctrine, Voting, Precedent, Legal practice, William O. Douglas, Bush v. Gore, Suggestion, Politics, Separation of powers, Career, Self-esteem, United States federal judge, Institution, Felix Frankfurter