Leseprobe
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Framing Europe
Juan Díez Medrano
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Politikwissenschaft
Beschreibung
This book provides a major empirical analysis of differing attitudes to European integration in three of Europe's most important countries: Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. From its beginnings, the European Union has resounded with debate over whether to move toward a federal or intergovernmental system. However, Juan Díez Medrano argues that empirical analyses of support for integration--by specialists in international relations, comparative politics, and survey research--have failed to explain why some countries lean toward federalism whereas others lean toward intergovernmentalism.
By applying frame analysis to a unique set of primary sources (in-depth interviews, newspaper articles, novels, history texts, political speeches, and survey data), Díez Medrano demonstrates the role of major historical events in transforming national cultures and thus creating new opportunities for political transformation. Clearly written and rigorously argued, Framing Europe explains differences in support for European integration between the three countries studied in light of the degree to which each realized its particular "supranational project" outside Western Europe. Only the United Kingdom succeeded in consolidating an empire and retaining it after World War II, while Germany and Spain each abandoned their corresponding aspirations. These differences meant that these countries' populations developed different degrees of identification as Europeans and, partly in consequence, different degrees of support for the building of a federal Europe.
Kundenbewertungen
Early modern period, Eastern Europe, Legislation, University of Stuttgart, World War II, Dictatorship, Politician, Globalization, Respondent, Aftermath of World War II, Die Zeit, Nazism, Explanation, United States of Europe, Soviet Union, East Germany, Skepticism, European Union, British Empire, European Economic Community, Germans, Communism, Supranational union, Continental Europe, Foreign worker, Result, European integration, Modernity, West Germany, Nation state, Unemployment, Europe, Governance, Supporter, Political party, Public sphere, United Kingdom, Criticism, Political culture, National identity, Sovereignty, Democratic deficit, Spaniards, Imperialism, European Parliament, Czechoslovakia, Eastern Bloc, Op-ed, Nazi Germany, Foreign policy, New Statesman, Western Europe, Hispanidad, Neues Deutschland, Eurobarometer, Isolationism, Evaluation, Schengen Agreement, Superiority (short story), Protectionism, The Economist, Democracy, Hegemony, German reunification, Heinrich Mann, Man Booker Prize, Great power, Francoist Spain, National interest, Politics