img Leseprobe Leseprobe

Criminal Trials and Mental Disorders

Thomas L. Hafemeister

EPUB
ca. 37,99
Amazon iTunes Thalia.de Weltbild.de Hugendubel Bücher.de ebook.de kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble bol.com Legimi yourbook.shop Kulturkaufhaus ebooks-center.de
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

NYU Press img Link Publisher

Geisteswissenschaften, Kunst, Musik / Psychologie

Beschreibung

The complicated relationship between defendants with mental health disorders and the criminal justice system

The American criminal justice system is based on the bedrock principles of fairness and justice for all. In striving to ensure that all criminal defendants are treated equally under the law, it endeavors to handle similar cases in similar fashion, attempting to apply rules and procedures even-handedly regardless of a defendant’s social class, race, ethnicity, or gender. Yet, the criminal justice system has also recognized exceptions when special circumstances underlie a defendant’s behavior or are likely to skew the defendant’s trial. One of the most controversial set of exceptions –often poorly articulated and inconsistently applied – involves criminal defendants with a mental disorder.

A series of special rules and procedures has evolved over the centuries, often without fanfare and even today with little systematic examination, that lawyers and judges apply to cases involving defendants with a mental disorder. This book provides an analysis of the key issues in this dynamic interplay between individuals with a mental disorder and the criminal justice system.

The volume identifies the various stages of criminal justice proceedings when the mental status of a defendant may be relevant, associated legal and policy issues, the history and evolution of these issues, and how they are currently resolved. To assist this exploration, the text also offers an overview of mental disorders, their relevance to criminal proceedings, how forensic mental health assessments are conducted and employed during these proceedings, and their application to competency and responsibility determinations. In sum, this book provides an important resource for students and scholars with an interest in mental health, law, and criminal justice.

Weitere Titel in dieser Kategorie
Cover Social Animal
Joshua Aronson
Cover On Dreams and the East
Giovanni V. R. Sorge
Cover Porsche Outlaws
Michael Alan Ross
Cover The Hype Cycle
Arnold Schelsky
Cover ANXIETY FREE
Dr. Dave Ferruolo
Cover The Tribe Of Judah Experience
Taylor E Ingram-Johnson

Kundenbewertungen

Schlagwörter

insanity defense myths, Colorado v. Connelly, de facto mental health care system, conditional release and release revocations, the insanity defense and variations, functional test, Miranda rights, risk assessments, outpatient community treatment, forensic mental health evaluations, abolition of the insanity defense, indefinite length of stay, American Law Institute Model Penal Code test, Indiana v. Edwards, Miranda v. Arizona, correctional facility placements, mental disorders and violence, Dusky v. United States, categorical incompetence, right to a jury, standard of proof, federal test, trauma and stressor-related disorders, clear and convincing evidence, criminal justice system, irresistible impulse test, therapeutic jurisprudence, insanity defense, competence to waive the right to an attorney, impact of mental disorders, absence at trial, law enforcement discretion, mental disorders and criminal behavior, bona fide doubt, forensic mental health assessments, Jones v. United States, obtaining experts for indigent defendant, psychodynamic models, actus reus, Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooter, sleep-walking defense, burden of proof, criminal proceedings, judicial hearings, mental disorder myths, presumption of incompetence, Gabrielle Giffords Shooting, Jackson v. Indiana, Sell v. United States, indicators of malingering, malingering, competence to confess, Medina v. California, The Unabomber, Durham rule, competency to stand trial, present mental capacity, treatment over objection, competence to testify, criminal trial proceedings, broken window approach, deific decree defense, second evaluations, reporting requirements, forensic mental health assessment process, Cooper v. Oklahoma, history of irrational behaviour, dissociative disorders, scope of expert’s assistance, Long Island Rail Road Shooter, automatic commitment, battered spouse/child defense, sua sponte, personality disorders, competence to plead guilty, criminal justice system alternatives, neurocognitive disorders, shifting/raising burden of proof, antisocial personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorders, Boston Marathon Bombing, consult with assist attorney, Montana v. Egelhoff, psychiatric facility placements, Clark v. Arizona, insanity acquittee post-trial dispositions, nonadversarial team approach, standards for establishing competence, bipolar disorders, initial evaluation request, assessing malingering, justification versus excuse, mental health courts, correctional facility evaluations, Foucha v. Louisiana, impact of medication, demeanor at trial, fair and just trials, Pate v. Robinson, crisis intervention teams, evaluation locations, competence to represent oneself, Godinez v. Moran, evaluator qualifications, guilty but mentally ill verdict, Elizabeth Smart Kidnapping, psychotic disorders, clinical mental health evaluations and treatment, Virginia Tech Shooter, depressive disorders, amnesia, incompetent to stand trial, Drope v. Missouri