Governing through Standards: the Faceless Masters of Higher Education
Katja Brøgger
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Springer International Publishing
Geisteswissenschaften, Kunst, Musik / Bildungswesen
Beschreibung
This book offers an empirical and theoretical account of the mode of governance that characterizes the Bologna Process. In addition, it shows how the reform materializes and is translated in everyday working life among professors and managers in higher education. It examines the so-called Open Method of Coordination as a powerful actor that uses “soft governance” to advance transnational standards in higher education. The book shows how these standards no longer serve as tools for what were once human organizational, national or international, regulators. Instead, the standards have become regulators themselves – the faceless masters of higher education. By exploring this, the book reveals the close connections between the Bologna Process and the EU regarding regulative and monitoring techniques such as standardizations and comparisons, which are carried out through the Open Method of Coordination. It suggests that the Bologna Process works as a subtle means to circumvent the EU’s subsidiarity principle, making it possible to accomplish a European governance of higher education despite the fact that education falls outside EU’s legislative reach. The book’s research interest in translation processes, agency and power relations among policy actors positions it in studies on policy transfer, policy borrowing and globalization. However, different from conventional approaches, this study draws on additional interpretive frameworks such as new materialism.
Kundenbewertungen
Bologna Declaration of 1999, globalization studies, subsidiarity principle, Open Method of Coordination, multi-sited policy ethnography, modularization and the outcome-orientation of the curriculum, social dimension of reform processes, policy borrowing, governing technologies, big data, performance data, standardising devices and monitoring practices, policy ontology, material-affective infrastructures, national and international regulators, EU's subsidiarity principle, higher education and transnational education reform