img Leseprobe Leseprobe

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review

Comparative Perspectives

Guobin Zhu (Hrsg.)

PDF
ca. 213,99
Amazon iTunes Thalia.de Weltbild.de Hugendubel Bücher.de ebook.de kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble bol.com Legimi yourbook.shop Kulturkaufhaus ebooks-center.de
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Springer International Publishing img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Internationales Recht, Ausländisches Recht

Beschreibung

This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for.

Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law.


Weitere Titel in dieser Kategorie
Cover Conflict of Laws
Adrian Briggs
Cover The Wretched of the Global South
Thamil Venthan Ananthavinayagan

Kundenbewertungen

Schlagwörter

Separation of powers, Judicial review of administrative actions, Judicial self-restraint and judicial passivism, Comparative administrative law, Judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, Role of the Courts, Judicial self-restraint with caution, Constitutional review, Judicial power, Administrative law