img Leseprobe Leseprobe

Precedents and Judicial Politics in EU Immigration Law

Marie De Somer

PDF
ca. 106,99
Amazon iTunes Thalia.de Weltbild.de Hugendubel Bücher.de ebook.de kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble bol.com Legimi yourbook.shop Kulturkaufhaus ebooks-center.de
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Springer International Publishing img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Politisches System

Beschreibung

This study explores the use of precedents in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). It argues that a strategic use of precedent-based discourses aids the Court in developing its jurisprudence autonomously; that is, independent of the political preferences of EU member states. The study is based on a long-term assessment of CJEU case law in the politically sensitive area of immigration law. It traces the Court’s rulings in this area from the 1970s up until the most recent period. The study identifies a series of consistent discursive patterns that slowly, but surely, moved EU immigration law beyond what member states had intended. The work takes an interdisciplinary approach, engaging with both political science and legal discussions on the Court of Justice and its role in processes of European integration.

Weitere Titel in dieser Kategorie
Cover I Heart Politics
Phoenix Andrews

Kundenbewertungen

Schlagwörter

Neofunctionalism, Incrementalism, Quantitative Research, EU immigration law, EU citizenship, european union politics, Contextualist Legal Scholarship, free movement law, Intergovernmentalism, Observational Equivalence, judicial autonomy, Family Reunification Directive, European integration, Citizenship Directive, self-citation, Court legitimacy, Qualitative Research, judicial interlocutors, mixed methods, Member States, Court's role