img Leseprobe Leseprobe

Acting under the "Guise of the Good". A critical analysis of the evaluation requirement for intentional agency

Andjelika Eissing-Patenova

PDF
13,99
Amazon iTunes Thalia.de Weltbild.de Hugendubel Bücher.de ebook.de kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble bol.com Legimi yourbook.shop Kulturkaufhaus ebooks-center.de
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

GRIN Verlag img Link Publisher

Geisteswissenschaften, Kunst, Musik / Philosophie

Beschreibung

Essay from the year 2019 in the subject Philosophy - Theoretical (Realisation, Science, Logic, Language), grade: 1,00, University of Salzburg, language: English, abstract: Do we always perceive our actions as good? I defend the claim that an agent always perceives at least some good in his intentional action - often called the “guise of the good“ (GG) thesis. In the philosophical debate, this goodness requirement has often been rejected by pointing to its problematic consequences. However, the source of such objections lies in the ambiguity and the imprecise use of the term “good“. Thus, I will show how the presumed problems can be tackled. First, "intentional action" is specified and a distinction of two interpretations of the term “good“ is given, which are relevant not only for the purpose of this paper, but also for gaining a clear view on the debate about the goodness requirement for intentional agency in general. Then, my main argument is presented and justified in detail, explaining for which understanding of “good“ it is correct and for which it can obviously be deemed false. The main argument goes as follows: (P1): Intentional actions are actions done for motivating reasons by an agent A. (P2): If A has motivating reasons for his intentional action, he necessarily perceives at least some good in his action. (C): Therefore, A always perceives at least some good in his intentional action. This paper further includes a reconstruction of Kieran Setiya's objection to the GG thesis. Regarding his arguments, I will show in which way the problems highlighted can be handled by applying my argument. I conclude with a brief overview of the results, their practical implications and a demand for further interdisciplinary investigation, especially in psychology.

Weitere Titel in dieser Kategorie
Cover One (Un)Like the Other
Michael F. Andrews
Cover Thus Spoke Zarathustra
Friedrich Nietzsche
Cover The Sāṃkhya System
Christopher Key Chapple
Cover Confidence
Ethan Nichtern
Cover Out of the World
Peter Sloterdijk

Kundenbewertungen

Schlagwörter

guise of the good, morally good, good, act, argument, intentionality, reasons-explanation, action, perception, Sophocles, awareness, theory of action, agent, evaluate, good reason, Kieran Setiya, badness, habit, bad, evaluation, disposition, evaluation requirement, goodness requirement, rational, intentional agency, interpretation of good, morally bad, intentional, intelligible, intelligibility, moral good, purpose, reasons, requirement, theoretical philosophy, meaning of good, objective, interpretation, motivating reasons, psychology, on purpose, Butterfill, compulsion, action done for reasons, action theory, reason, rationality, agency, purposive action, reflex, debate, goodness, philosophy, intention, subjective, moral, reflection, reflect, Setiya, reasons explanation, explanation, non-moral good, movement, good reasons