img Leseprobe Leseprobe

The Planning Theory of Law

A Critical Reading

Giovanni Tuzet (Hrsg.), Damiano Canale (Hrsg.)

ca. 117,69
Amazon iTunes Hugendubel Bü kobo Mayersche Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Springer Netherland img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Allgemeines, Lexika


This collection of essays is the outcome of a workshop with Scott Shapiro on The Planning Theory of Law that took place in December 2009 at Bocconi University. It brings together a group of scholars who wrote their contributions to the workshop on a preliminary draft of Shapiro’s Legality. Then, after the workshop, they wrote their final essays on the published version of the book. The contributions clearly highlight the difference of the continental and civil law perspective from the common law background of Shapiro but at the same time the volume tries to bridge the gap between the two. The essays provide a critical reading of the planning theory of law, highlighting its merits on the one hand and objecting to some parts of it on the other hand. Each contribution discusses in detail a chapter of Shapiro’s book and together they cover the whole of Shapiro’s theory. So the book presents a balanced and insightful discussion of the arguments of Legality.

Weitere Titel von diesem Autor
Weitere Titel zum gleichen Preis
Cover The Art of Legislating
Virgilio Zapatero Gómez
Cover Proportionality in Law
Jorge Silva Sampaio
Cover Ratio Legis
Verena Klappstein



Restatement of Legal Positivism, Planning Theory of Law, What is Wrong with Legal Realism?, Recognition, Convention and Obligation, The Nature of Law, Legality: Between Purposes and Functions, Judicial Decision Making, Scott Shapiro's Legality, Continental and Civil Law Disagreements, Paradox and Legal Positivism, Misunderstandings about Legal Positivism, Interpretation and Meta-interpretation