img Leseprobe Leseprobe

Steadfast Democrats

How Social Forces Shape Black Political Behavior

Ismail K. White, Chryl N. Laird

ca. 18,99
Amazon iTunes Hugendubel Bü kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble Legimi
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Princeton University Press img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Politikwissenschaft


A groundbreaking look at how group expectations unify Black Americans in their support of the Democratic party

Black Americans are by far the most unified racial group in American electoral politics, with 80 to 90 percent identifying as Democrats—a surprising figure given that nearly a third now also identify as ideologically conservative, up from less than 10 percent in the 1970s. Why has ideological change failed to push more Black Americans into the Republican Party? Steadfast Democrats answers this question with a pathbreaking new theory that foregrounds the specificity of the Black American experience and illuminates social pressure as the key element of Black Americans’ unwavering support for the Democratic Party.

Ismail White and Chryl Laird argue that the roots of Black political unity were established through the adversities of slavery and segregation, when Black Americans forged uniquely strong social bonds for survival and resistance. White and Laird explain how these tight communities have continued to produce and enforce political norms—including Democratic Party identification in the post–Civil Rights era. The social experience of race for Black Americans is thus fundamental to their political choices. Black voters are uniquely influenced by the social expectations of other Black Americans to prioritize the group’s ongoing struggle for freedom and equality. When navigating the choice of supporting a political party, this social expectation translates into affiliation with the Democratic Party. Through fresh analysis of survey data and original experiments, White and Laird explore where and how Black political norms are enforced, what this means for the future of Black politics, and how this framework can be used to understand the electoral behavior of other communities.

An innovative explanation for why Black Americans continue in political lockstep, Steadfast Democrats sheds light on the motivations consolidating an influential portion of the American electoral population.

Weitere Titel von diesem Autor
Weitere Titel zum gleichen Preis
Cover Prosecution of an Insurrection
The House Impeachment Managers and the House Defense
Cover Human Rights at International Borders: A Trainer's Guide
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Cover The Centrist Solution
Senator Joseph I. Lieberman
Cover Devolution
Andreas Gross
Cover Conceptos fundamentales para el debate constitucional
Departamento de Derecho Público. Facultad de Derecho Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Cover The Forgotten City
Phil Allmendinger
Cover The Women’s War
Anne-Cathrine Riebnitzsky
Cover Tax the Rich!
Morris Pearl



Decision-making, Black people, Inference, Spencer Overton, Self-concept, Uncle Tom, Respondent, Reinforcement, Oppression, Ethnic group, Publishing, White Americans, Barack Obama, Obstacle, Explanation, Interviewer effect, Pew Research Center, Collective action, Iteration, Telephone interview, Party identification, Ambiguity, African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–68), Underclass, Attendance, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Social cost, Social exclusion, Voting bloc, Norm (social), Self-interest, Social distance, Twitter, Historically black colleges and universities, Minority group, Political organization, Southern strategy, Election, Incentive, Multiracial Americans, Voter turnout, Racial segregation, Accountability, Interview, Consideration, Kinship, Defection, Black Power, Social environment, Political party, Race traitor, Conformity, Duke University, Social relation, Percentage point, Empowerment, Race (human categorization), Black church, Ideology, Social dilemma, Racial politics, Ballot, Participation (decision making), Slavery, Person of color, Politics, Welfare, Tax, Probability, Group dynamics, Affirmative action, Black Report, Identity politics, Black elite, Institution, White supremacy, Civil Rights Act of 1964, General Social Survey, Racism, Social inequality, African Americans, Political history, Political science, Martin Luther King, Jr., Black Twitter, Trade-off, Ingroups and outgroups, Americans, Government, Liberal conservatism, National Urban League, Cost–benefit analysis, Southern University, Political campaign, Bowdoin College, Group cohesiveness, Voting, Activism, Opinion poll, Social capital