img Leseprobe Leseprobe

The University and the Global Knowledge Society

John W. Meyer, David John Frank

ca. 28,99
Amazon iTunes Hugendubel Bü kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble Legimi
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Princeton University Press img Link Publisher

Schule und Lernen / Sekundarstufe I


How the university went global and became the heart of the information age

The university is experiencing an unprecedented level of success today, as more universities in more countries educate more students in more fields. At the same time, the university has become central to a knowledge society based on the belief that everyone can, through higher education, access universal truths and apply them in the name of progress. This book traces the university's rise over the past hundred years to become the cultural linchpin of contemporary society, revealing how the so-called ivory tower has become profoundly interlinked with almost every area of human endeavor.

David John Frank and John Meyer describe how, as the university expanded, student and faculty bodies became larger, more diverse, and more empowered to turn knowledge into action. Their contributions to society underscored the public importance of scholarship, and as the cultural authority of universities grew they increased the scope of their research and teaching interests. As a result, the university has become the bedrock of today's information-based society, an institution that is now implicated in the solution to every conceivable problem.

But, as Frank and Meyer also show, the conditions that helped spur the university's recent ascendance are not immutable: eruptions of nationalism, authoritarianism, and illiberalism undercut the university's universalistic and rationalistic premises, and may threaten the centrality of the university itself.



Percentage, Bologna Process, UNESCO, Nation state, Harvard University, Illustration, International Labour Organization, Governmentality, Consultant, Faculty of Law, Engineering, Education in the United States, Translational research, Curriculum, Knowledge economy, Sociology, Credential, Governance, Environmental science, University of Toulouse, Graduate school, Learning, College and university rankings, Rector (academia), Social status, Social structure, Empowerment, Archaeology, Test (assessment), Writing, Morality, Psychology, Student, Of Education, Professionalization, Ann Swidler, Academic degree, Counting, Higher education, Industrial school, Entrepreneurship, Food, University of Cambridge, Modernity, Land-grant university, Economic development, Technology, Professor, University of Belgrade, Profession, Liberal arts education, New public management, Honeycrisp, World War II, Society, Sciences Po, Tertiary education, University, University of Dublin, Altruism, World Bank, Faculty (academic staff), Mechanical engineering, Civil engineering, Literary criticism, Political science, Contemporary society, Journalism, Hypermodernity, Liberalization, Agriculture, Commodity, Abitur, Universalization, Vocational education, Global University, Ideology, Information society, Business school, Institution, Foie gras, Global citizenship, Globalization, Knowledge society, Requirement, Career, Commercialization, Suggestion, Accounting, Social science, Teacher, University system, Organizational structure, Social progress, Education For All, Personhood, Print culture, Diploma, Social reality, Peking University