Leseprobe
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Voice, Trust, and Memory
Melissa S. Williams
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Politikwissenschaft
Beschreibung
Does fair political representation for historically disadvantaged groups require their presence in legislative bodies? The intuition that women are best represented by women, and African-Americans by other African-Americans, has deep historical roots. Yet the conception of fair representation that prevails in American political culture and jurisprudence--what Melissa Williams calls "liberal representation"--concludes that the social identity of legislative representatives does not bear on their quality as representatives. Liberal representation's slogan, "one person, one vote," concludes that the outcome of the electoral and legislative process is fair, whatever it happens to be, so long as no voter is systematically excluded. Challenging this notion, Williams maintains that fair representation is powerfully affected by the identity of legislators and whether some of them are actually members of the historically marginalized groups that are most in need of protection in our society.
Williams argues first that the distinctive voice of these groups should be audible within the legislative process. Second, she holds that the self-representation of these groups is necessary to sustain their trust in democratic institutions. The memory of state-sponsored discrimination against these groups, together with ongoing patterns of inequality along group lines, provides both a reason to recognize group claims and a way of distinguishing stronger from weaker claims. The book closes by proposing institutions that can secure fair representation for marginalized groups without compromising principles of democratic freedom and equality.
Kundenbewertungen
Incumbent, Citizenship, Legislature, Racism, Self-ownership, Election, Prejudice, Theory, Equal opportunity, Exclusion, Legislator, Single-member district, Democracy, Political philosophy, Supermajority, Common good, Electoral district, Slavery, Politician, Citizens (Spanish political party), Disadvantage, Proportional representation, Structural inequality, Suggestion, Social contract, Social exclusion, Rhetoric, African-American Civil Rights Movement (1954–68), Liberalism, Pluralism (political theory), Political culture, Redistricting, Gerrymandering, Disfranchisement, Will Kymlicka, Consideration, Strict scrutiny, Shaw v. Reno, Equal Protection Clause, Obstacle, Public sphere, Social group, Discrimination, Policy, Legislation, Voting system, African Americans, Deliberation, Political science, Public policy, Voting, The Public Interest, Abigail Thernstrom, Accountability, Political sociology, Society, Requirement, Civil and political rights, Institution, Social class, Voting Rights Act of 1965, Minority group, Oppression, Concurrent majority, Representative democracy, Advocacy, Politics, Criticism, Women's suffrage, Suffrage