img Leseprobe Leseprobe

Going Local

Decentralization, Democratization, and the Promise of Good Governance

Merilee S. Grindle

PDF
ca. 33,99
Amazon iTunes Thalia.de Weltbild.de Hugendubel Bücher.de ebook.de kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble bol.com Legimi yourbook.shop Kulturkaufhaus ebooks-center.de
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Princeton University Press img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Politikwissenschaft

Beschreibung

Many developing countries have a history of highly centralized governments. Since the late 1980s, a large number of these governments have introduced decentralization to increase democracy and improve services, especially in small communities far from capital cities. In Going Local, an unprecedented study of the effects of decentralization on thirty Mexican municipalities, Merilee Grindle describes how local governments respond when they are assigned new responsibilities and resources under decentralization policies. She explains why decentralization leads to better local governments in some cases--and why it fails to in others.


Combining quantitative and qualitative methods, Grindle examines data based on a random sample of Mexican municipalities--and ventures into town halls to follow public officials as they seek to manage a variety of tasks amid conflicting pressures and new expectations. Decentralization, she discovers, is a double-edged sword. While it allows public leaders to make significant reforms quickly, institutional weaknesses undermine the durability of change, and legacies of the past continue to affect how public problems are addressed. Citizens participate, but they are more successful at extracting resources from government than in holding local officials and agencies accountable for their actions. The benefits of decentralization regularly predicted by economists, political scientists, and management specialists are not inevitable, she argues. Rather, they are strongly influenced by the quality of local leadership and politics.

Weitere Titel von diesem Autor

Kundenbewertungen

Schlagwörter

Political boss, Tamaulipas, Development aid, Public administration, Local election, Capacity building, Clientelism, Economics, Local government, Social safety net, Subsidy, Political campaign, Dictatorship, Public security, Activism, Entrepreneurship, Budget crisis, New Federalism, New public management, Civil society, Local economic development, Corruption, Governance, Funding, Politics, Insurgency, Economic development, Lobbying, Professionalization, Electoral fraud, Employment, Municipal services, WIN Party, Elite capture, Rotary International, Good governance, Institutional Revolutionary Party, Party platform, Tax holiday, Poverty reduction, Citizens (Spanish political party), Incumbent, Welfare, Democratization, Institution, Tax, Decentralization, Multi-party system, Good government, State government, Bribery, Voting, Property tax, Accountability, Ayuntamiento, Electoral reform, Elite, Political party, Solidaridad, Civil registry, Participatory budgeting, Democracy, Foray, Dominant-party system, Quality assurance, Public sector, Ministry of Social Development (Panama), Urbanization, Government failure, Politician