img Leseprobe Leseprobe

Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation

PDF
ca. 96,29 €
Amazon iTunes Thalia.de Weltbild.de Hugendubel Bücher.de ebook.de kobo Osiander Google Books Barnes&Noble bol.com Legimi yourbook.shop Kulturkaufhaus ebooks-center.de
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Hinweis: Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.

Springer International Publishing img Link Publisher

Sozialwissenschaften, Recht, Wirtschaft / Allgemeines, Lexika

Beschreibung

This book provides theoretical tools for evaluating the soundness of arguments in the context of legal argumentation. It deals with a number of general argument types and their particular use in legal argumentation. It provides detailed analyses of argument from authority, argument ad hominem, argument from ignorance, slippery slope argument and other general argument types. Each of these argument types can be used to construct arguments that are sound as well as arguments that are unsound. To evaluate an argument correctly one must be able to distinguish the sound instances of a certain argument type from its unsound instances. This book promotes the development of theoretical tools for this task.

Weitere Titel in dieser Kategorie
Cover Legal Recognition of Animal Sentience
Legal Recognition of Animal Sentience
Ferrere M B Rodriguez Ferrere
95,56 €
Cover Scientia Iuris
Scientia Iuris
Luca Siliquini-Cinelli
160,49 €
Cover Modern Criminal Law
Modern Criminal Law
Simester A P Simester
101,25 €
Cover Modern Criminal Law
Modern Criminal Law
Simester A P Simester
101,25 €
Cover Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence
Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence
Convention Delegates of The Constitutional Convention
2,48 €

Kundenbewertungen

Schlagwörter

Fallacies in Legal Argumentation, Epistemic Credibility, Authority and the Conversion of Fallacious Arguments, Generality and the Conversion of Fallacious Arguments, Anti-Theoretical Fallacy, Frames of Interpretation, Ad Hominem Fallacies, Legal Argumentation, Imprecise Expressions in Argumentation, Slippery Slope Arguments, Dworkin’s Answer to Posner’s Analysis of Bush v. Gore, Argument Types, Statutory Expression and Proportionality, Absence of Evidence