* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Laboratory Life
Steve Woolgar, Bruno Latour
* Affiliatelinks/Werbelinks
Links auf reinlesen.de sind sogenannte Affiliate-Links. Wenn du auf so einen Affiliate-Link klickst und über diesen Link einkaufst, bekommt reinlesen.de von dem betreffenden Online-Shop oder Anbieter eine Provision. Für dich verändert sich der Preis nicht.
Geisteswissenschaften, Kunst, Musik / Pädagogik
Beschreibung
This highly original work presents laboratory science in a deliberately skeptical way: as an anthropological approach to the culture of the scientist. Drawing on recent work in literary criticism, the authors study how the social world of the laboratory produces papers and other "texts,"' and how the scientific vision of reality becomes that set of statements considered, for the time being, too expensive to change. The book is based on field work done by Bruno Latour in Roger Guillemin's laboratory at the Salk Institute and provides an important link between the sociology of modern sciences and laboratory studies in the history of science.
Kundenbewertungen
Sociology, Thought, Mass spectrometry, Science, University of Surrey, Desk, Quantity, Endocrinology, Literature, Participant, Prevalence, Textbook, Cell culture, Calculation, Release factor, Superimposition, Addition, Hormone, Bioassay, Peptide, Postscript, Observation, Somatostatin, Requirement, Laboratory Life, Suggestion, Philosopher, Emergence, Social constructionism, Analogy, Facticity, Neuroendocrinology, Assay, Terminology, Philosophy of science, Theory, Explanation, Indication (medicine), Lecture, Subjectivity, Interaction, Oxytocin, Reason, Phenomenon, Princeton University Press, Instance (computer science), Career, Finding, Preprint, Scientist, Field research, Social research, Spectrometer, In vitro, Result, Clinician, Chemist, Background noise, Biological activity, Diagram, Publication, Relativism, University of Cambridge, Sociology of scientific knowledge, Amino acid, Review article, Physiology, Writing, Credibility, Criticism